LinkedIn has no bold button and no font picker, so bold text on LinkedIn is made of Unicode characters you paste in: your letters are swapped for characters that were drawn bold to begin with. Pick the field you are writing for, style all of it or just one line, and see it laid out the way LinkedIn will lay it out - including where the “see more” fold cuts it.
Ctrl+I and Ctrl+U do italic and underline, with Cmd on a Mac. The same steps work for a headline, an About section and a comment - a LinkedIn bold text generator is not really doing anything to LinkedIn, it is handing you different characters, so anywhere you can type is somewhere they can be pasted.
Remove formatting turns styled characters back into ordinary letters, which is the fix once you have bolded something you now want people to be able to search for.
The preview draws the line where LinkedIn stops showing your text. Getting above it is a writing problem more than a counting one, and a few things help.
Then read the grey text in the preview. If the part you care about is down there, move it up rather than trimming words off the top.
Styled text buys you emphasis in a field that has none. It costs you searchability and it costs you readers on a screen reader. Which field you are in decides whether that trade is worth making.
In a post, it usually is. One bold line at the top works as a heading, and nobody goes looking for the body of a post in a search box.
In your headline, your About section or a job title, it is usually a mistake. Those are the fields recruiters search, and a styled word stops matching what they type. Leave the nouns alone and style nothing that somebody might look for.
Writing for somewhere else? On Instagram the problem is blank lines rather than bold, and the Instagram line break generator handles it. For Facebook and Messenger, use the Facebook text formatter and font generator. Every platform’s cap and cut-off sits in one table on the character limits page.
A box of its own, separate from the editor at the top: up there you are writing the post, down here you are trying styles on. Type once and all 17 show the same words, ready to copy. Five of them are here only - the toolbar keeps the twelve that earn a permanent button. Each is a set of real Unicode characters rather than a font file, which is why they survive being pasted into a field with no formatting controls. Eight render on any device, and they are the eight at the top; the rest depend on the fonts your reader happens to have.
| Style | Looks like | Renders on | Use it for | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bold | ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ ๐ | Any device | The one style worth using in a post. A single bold opening line works as a heading above the fold. | |
| Italic | ๐๐ข๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐น๐ต | Any device | An aside or a quoted line. Quieter than bold, and harder to read in quantity. | |
| Bold Italic | ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฉ | Any device | Rarely the right answer in a professional feed. Two emphases at once reads as shouting. | |
| Serif Bold | ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ญ | Any device | Book-weight bold. Heavier than the sans version and reads as lifted from a document. | |
| Serif Italic | ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ก | Any device | A book-face italic, the most formal of the italics here. | |
| Sans | ๐ฒ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐พ ๐ณ๐พ๐๐ | Any device | Ordinary letters that are not ordinary letters. A line set slightly apart without any emphasis at all. | |
| Underline | Sฬฒaฬฒmฬฒpฬฒlฬฒeฬฒ Tฬฒeฬฒxฬฒtฬฒ | Any device | A section heading in a long post. Built from a mark under each letter rather than a separate alphabet. | |
| Strikethrough | Sฬถaฬถmฬถpฬถlฬถeฬถ Tฬถeฬถxฬถtฬถ | Any device | A correction, or a before-and-after. Used sparingly it reads as honest rather than gimmicky. | |
| Script | ๐ข๐ช๐ถ๐น๐ต๐ฎ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ฝ | Most devices | Almost never right on LinkedIn. It reads as decorative in a feed that is not. | |
| Script Light | ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ ๐โฏ ๐ฏโฏ๐๐ | Most devices | The same hand, drawn thinner, and the first thing to disappear at feed size on a phone. | |
| Gothic | ๐๐๐ช๐ญ๐ฉ๐ข ๐๐ข๐ต๐ฑ | Most devices | Gothic. Out of place in a professional post, and included because the gallery is the same everywhere. | |
| Bold Gothic | ๐พ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐๐๐ | Most devices | Gothic with the weight turned up. Same caveat. | |
| Double-Struck | ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ | Most devices | Outline letters. Occasionally used for a number in a results post. | |
| Monospace | ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ | Most devices | A code snippet, a reference number, or figures that should line up in a column. | |
| Small Caps | Sแดแดแดสแด Tแดxแด | Most devices | A subheading that stays quiet - the most LinkedIn-appropriate of the decorative styles. | |
| Circled | โโโโโโ โโโงโฃ | Most devices | Numbered steps in a list post, where bullets are not available. | |
| Wide | ๏ผณ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผด๏ฝ ๏ฝ๏ฝ | Most devices | Full-width letters, spaced out. Eats characters you need for the fold. |
A word of warning that matters more here than on any other platform: none of these are letters as far as LinkedIn search is concerned. Recruiters search headlines, job titles and About sections, and a styled word stops matching what they type. Style a line in a post; leave the fields people search alone.
Write the post here, select the words you want in bold and press Bold, or Ctrl+B. What you get back is not formatting - it is a set of Unicode characters that were drawn bold to begin with - so it survives being pasted into LinkedIn's post box, which has no formatting controls at all. The same steps work in a headline, an About section and a comment.
Yes. LinkedIn text formatter, bold text generator, LinkedIn font generator, font formatter, text converter - they are all names for the same substitution, which is swapping the letters you typed for characters that already carry the style. Nothing is installed and nothing on LinkedIn's side changes, which is why one tool covers every field.
At about 140 characters on a phone and about 210 on a desktop, after which the rest is folded behind a "see more" link. The preview draws that line on your own text, and the grey part below it is what nobody reads unless they choose to. The cap is 3,000 characters, but the cap is almost never the number that matters.
LinkedIn strips formatting out of posts, so there is nothing to press. What every LinkedIn bold tool does instead is swap your letters for Unicode characters that were drawn bold to begin with, so the styling travels inside the text and survives being pasted in.
Reach, no. Searchability, yes: to LinkedIn a bold letter is a different character from the plain one, so a styled word no longer matches what somebody types into the search box.
Poorly. Depending on the reader, a styled word is spelled out one Unicode character name at a time or skipped over in silence. Anyone using one will get either noise or nothing where your emphasis was meant to be.
No. These are ordinary Unicode characters, the same kind as an emoji or an accented letter. The risk is your readers rather than the platform: a whole post in script is harder to read than plain text.
Yes. Be aware that your headline follows you around the site, appearing under your name on every post and comment you make, so a styled one is far more visible than a styled post and far more likely to read as shouting.
Usually one of two things. The device reading your post has no font covering those characters, so it draws empty boxes instead - bold, italic, underline and strikethrough are the four that survive anywhere, and they sit first in the toolbar for that reason. Or you pasted into a field LinkedIn checks more strictly, such as your name. Everything else - post, headline, About, comment - accepts it.
Select the part you want back and press Remove formatting. Undo works too, as do Ctrl+Z and the usual shortcuts.
Unicode only has bold, italic and the other styles for the 26 basic Latin letters, and for digits in some of them. Accented letters such as รฉ, รผ and รฅ are styled by giving the letter the style and keeping the accent on top of it. ร, รธ, ร and a handful of others have no styled version at all, so they stay as they are.